|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JCS 35 (4), July-August 2003 What has been the effect of ‘reconceptualization’ on contemporary curriculum studies? Has it led to a ‘renaissance’? Or aggravated a field already labelled ‘moribund’? Several scholars vigorously debate these questions and suggest directions that curriculum studies should take in the future. Argument: William G. Wraga and Peter S. Hlebowitsh, Toward a renaissance in curriculum theory and development in the USA Commentary: Wayne J. Urban, What makes a renaissance? Rejoinder: William M. Reynolds, Debate, nostalgia, and ressentiment Commentary: William G. Wraga and Peter S. Hlebowitsh, Conversation, collaboration, and community in the US curriculum field
|
 |
|