NFB Kids reminds us that the films of the NFB are an incredibly rich reserve of visual documents for social historians. Historians interested in childhood, in particular, have much to gain from surveying the vast array of representations of Canadian children=s lives B everything from health, school, citizenship, First Nations, the Inuit and the north, immigration, sex education and sexual abuse, are spotlighted in the NFB catalogue. Low=s work marks a useful Atake one@ on this important primary source material.

NFB Kids is perhaps best thought of as a guide to the array of material available in the NFB catalogue concerning children from 1939 to 1989. Low surveys virtually every film in the fifty-year period, setting his lens on those that concern or feature children prominently. What Low finds is indeed fascinating. We see children vacationing around the country, going to school, overcoming disabilities, engaging with technology, working, solving problems, and overcoming hardships. Children are the focus of the films Low surveys and their concerns, at least as adults construct them, are highlighted.

Low attempts to make some sense of NFB portrayals of children by organizing the book into a Aprogressive narrative@ on the nature of both the NFB society and its children. He focuses first on the original stewardship of NFB founder, John Grierson, and his tenacious commitment to promoting Ademocratic citizenship@ through film.  Grierson=s original intention, to use film as a powerful tool of propaganda to convince Canadians about the benefits of the Aco-operative state@ (p. 28), remained at the centre of the NFB for decades. A subsequent chapter focusing on a particular film, ALessons in Living@ (1944), is arguably the strongest of the book. It explores the considerable gap between the film=s promotion of progressive education and the actual lives and needs of the community actors in the film. By Adeconstructing@ the portrayal of community improvement in ALessons in Living,@ based in the actual community of Lantzville, British Columbia, readers are shown the lies behind the film=s claims. The approach Low takes in this chapter suggests what could result if the analysis of NFB films are pushed to consider not just the reflected image in the ANFB mirror,@ but the experiences of historical actors. While it does not surprise us that the magical turnaround of a community via school improvement was a farce manufactured by NFB filmmakers, it begs the question: what would such critical deconstruction reveal about the other NFB films Low includes in the book?

Remaining chapters offer chronological investigations of shifting themes in NFB films focusing on children. The postwar years saw the arrival of a new commissioner, Ross McLean, who sought to use film to help Canadians face up to the Ariddles of readjustment@ (p. 65).  McLean wanted NFB films to reflect Awhat is@ and Awhat could be@ and, according to Low, Achildren played a prominent role in this cinematic readjustment of Canadian society@ (p. 65).  The 1950s and 1960s see NFB films reflecting the period=s concern with mental hygiene, modern childrearing techniques, the arrival of the Ateenager,@ and hippie culture. Throughout the chapters, however, some consideration of the complex and messy relationship between the film=s portrayals and the lives of actual children is claimed but never fully fleshed out. For example, Low attests, Aas a body of films, the postwar portrayals of children constitute a panoramic record B an unfolding field of visions B of the changing physical, intellectual, and social realities of the peoples of Canada@ (p. 66).  The films tell only one half of this story and it is this half that Low concentrates on. In doing so, he offers some useful descriptions of what particular films contain. Much critical work on the Adeconstruction@ of these films, and their relationship to the secondary literature in the areas of parenting advice, education, race, class, and gender remains to be done. Low argues, for example, that Awith the exception of children who are portrayed as troubled by physical or mental illness, the vast majority of them are portrayed as happy. Indeed, among some of the most >naturalistic= portraits of children of this era, one finds the sentimental images of >childhood lost= so often associated with the period B such as with the happy campers in Ontario summer camps on Georgian Bay as represented in the film >Holiday Island= (1948).@  This is an important observation but needs to be taken one step further. Given the important work on the myth of the postwar golden era by authors such as Franca Iacovetta, Veronica Strong-Boag, and Mary Louise Adams, such film portrayals should be treated with critical suspicion.

The uneasy and complex relationship amongst the portrayals of Canadian children in NFB films, attempts to mould Canadian society into a particular image, and the lived experience of children in everyday situations remains a topic worth exploring.  Particularly around issues of gender, race, and class, Low=s first steps call for a continued critical analysis. The deeply racist nature of NFB films featuring First Nations, Inuit, and other children of non-White backgrounds are particularly insidious and demand critical attention on their own.  In APeople of the Potlatch@ (1944), the film=s narrator laments as an old chief dances, AOnce he danced as a tribute to his GodsYNow he dances only to recall the old days.@ (36) In AEskimo Summer@ (1943) narrator Lorne Greene states Athe gentle Eskimo is an example of perfect adaptationYEskimos make good mechanics, and learn about engines quickly.@ (36). On AChinese Canadians@ (1954) narrator Fred Davis claims some A40,000 Chinese live in VancouverYprejudice is on the decline.@(85).  Low hints at the problematic nature of these representations but never fully explores why and how NFB films contributed to the construction of Canada as a White, middle-class country.

Few historians have turned to NFB films for what they reflect about the changing nature of Canadian children and Canadian childhood.  Low takes on this question in a particular, if perhaps somewhat unsatisfactory, way.  Low does claim that the Acoherency of the social history of NFB portrayals may  be wholly attributed to its congruency with the social history of CanadaY@ (p. 4).  This congruency between the films and the history, however, is only hinted at here. Rather than focussing precisely on the relationship between NFB portrayals of children and the Areal@ world, Low opts to present an A>in-house= history of a cinematic society@ (p. 10).   In  this  way,  ANFB  Kids,@  not Canadian children who lived outside the camera=s gaze, become the focus.  The next step will be to bring the two together.

Mona Gleason
University of British Columbia